Т. 2. Азия и Африка: Наследие и современность

Источниковедение и историография Кореи Asia and Africa: their Heritage and Modernity. Vol. 2 195 in the study of literature in contemporary Republic of Korea, there are still many examples of a strong influence of the traditional Korean views in this field. This resulted in discussions on the principle concepts of literature and genres classification that are still going on in the South Korean academia. 3. The main conclusions of the paper are as follows: a. Until the late 19 th C., there was no special attention to “literature” in Korea, and no basis for forming any school of the study of literature. This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that literature in the Korean tradition was not viewed as a special category of texts . The ‘ mun’ concept supposed a general, non-specified approach, not distinguishing literature texts (in the Western view) as a category separate from historical and other “high” texts. Therefore the study of literature did not form as a separate filed, the historiography played the main role instead. b. As a result, some of contemporary approaches to the study of literature in Korea are still derived from the above-mentioned Korean tradition of working with historical texts. Thus, methods based on the “commentary tradition” are being applied to the study of Korean literature in the contemporary scholarship in South Korea. c. TheWestern tradition of the study of literature, including its research methods and terminology, has been gradually adopted in Korea in the 20 th C., and now it is being used actively. However, this approach is mostly applied to the study of the literary texts belonged to a foreign, predominantly Western tradition. Акуленко В. С. (ВИ-ШРМИ, ДВФУ, Владивосток) Образ русских и России в Корее в XVII–XVIII вв. по материалам корейской летописи «Анналы правящего дома Чосон» 1 Летопись «Анналы правящего дома Чосон» ( Чосон ванчжо силок ; 朝鮮王朝 實錄 ) является выдающимся письменным памятником и важным источником информации об истории Кореи и окружающих ее государств, охватывающим период более, чем 500 лет (XIV–XIX вв.). Памятник проливает свет не только на деяния правителей династии, но и на важнейшие события, касающиеся государства Чосон или происходившие у его границ. В этой связи появление первых русских путешественников в Восточной Азии, а также продвижение России на Дальний Восток, не могли быть не отражены на ее страницах. Анализу запечатленного в анналах образа России и русских и посвящена данная работа. 1 This work was supported by the Core University Program for Korean Studies through the Ministry of Education of the Republic of the Korea and Korean Studies Promotion Service of the Academy of Korean Studies (AKS-2015-OLU-2250003)